姚鹏, 丁远远, 姜长林, 马佳明, 孟凌新. 腹腔神经丛毁损阻滞癌痛患者血浆胃动素及β-内啡肽的变化[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2011, 38(5): 272-274 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2011.05.008
引用本文: 姚鹏, 丁远远, 姜长林, 马佳明, 孟凌新. 腹腔神经丛毁损阻滞癌痛患者血浆胃动素及β-内啡肽的变化[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2011, 38(5): 272-274 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2011.05.008

腹腔神经丛毁损阻滞癌痛患者血浆胃动素及β-内啡肽的变化

  • 摘要: 目的:对宫颈癌患者中HPV感染率及型别分布进行研究,探讨宫颈癌患者HPV多重感染与临床病理特征的关系。方法:选取2008年9月至2009年4月浙江省肿瘤医院因宫颈癌就诊且有临床病理确诊的患者171例,采用导流杂交基因芯片技术对HPV感染进行基因诊断和分型,并进一步比较HPV多重感染、单一感染、无感染者在年龄、临床分期、病理类型和淋巴结转移上的差异。结果:171例宫颈癌患者中HPV感染者为122例 (71.35%),其中单一感染者103例 (60.2%)、多重感染者19例 (11.1%);HPV多重感染中以二重感染最常见 (15例)、三重感染及四重感染各2例。单一感染主要是HPV16、 18、 58,多重感染主要是HPV16+58/52。无论是单一感染还是多重感染,均以含HPV16为主要的感染型别。年龄≥52岁宫颈癌患者中HPV多重感染的比例明显高于<52岁患者,且两者存在显著性差异 (P<0.05)。在临床分期、 病理分型及淋巴结转移上,HPV多重感染与单一感染或无感染者之间均无差异。结论: HPV多重感染与宫颈癌患者年龄有关,但与临床分期、病理类型、 淋巴结转移等预后因子均无关系, 可能是独立的预后预测因子。导流杂交基因芯片技术适合临床筛查HPV感染及对HPV进行基因分型。

     

    Abstract: Changes in Plasma Motilin and β-endorphin in Cancer Patients Treated with Neurolytic CeliacPlexus BlockPeng YAO1, Yuanyuan DING1, Changlin JIANG2, Jiaming MA1, Lingxin MENG1Correspondence to: Lingxin MENG, E-mail: menglx@sj-hospital.org1Department of Pain Control, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China2Daqing Oil Field General Hospital, Daqing 163001, ChinaAbstract Objective: To evaluate the effects of neurolytic celiac plexus block ( NCPB ) on pain relief, quality of life, and bloodconcentration of motilin and β-endorphin before and after treatment in patients with upper abdominal visceral cancer pain. Methods:Sixty-two patients with intractable upper abdominal visceral cancer pain were enrolled in the study ( 37 males and 25 females ). All cas-es, including those with pain managed by opioids and those who rejected opioid usage because of severe adverse effects, still sufferedpersistent moderate-to-severe pain ( NRS ≥5 ) and had poorer health-related quality of life. Patients with coagulation disorders, in-tra-abdominal infection, pyemia or intestinal obstruction were not included in this study. NCPB was performed under CT guidance. Nu-meric rating scales ( NRS ), pain relief and complications were recorded. Patients completed generic HS ( SF-36 ) and cancer-specificHRQL ( QOL-CS ) questionnaires before and after treatment to evaluate their quality of life. Blood concentration of motilin and β-en-dorphin was observed before treatment and 1, 3, and 7 days after NCPB. Results: Pain relief was observed in all patients after NCPB.Numeric rating scale ( NRS ) at day 7 after treatment was 1.1±0.3 on average, lower than that before treatment ( 7.6±1.2 ). Pain relief ≥50 % was achieved in 96.8 %. Some patients who experienced mild adverse effects including low blood pressure, diarrhea, nausea andvomiting needed to stop treatment. No severe complications were observed in this study. Higher scores were exhibited on all SF-36 andQOL-CS before NCPB and lower scores were seen after the NCPB. Blood concentrations of motilin and β-endorphin changed signifi-cantly after NCPB. Motilin level was increased on the first day after NCPB, peaked on day 3 and then slightly decreased on day 7. β-en-dorphin level was increased on day 3 and reached 336.9±29.4 pg/mL on day 7 after NCPB. Conclusion: NCPB under CT guidance isan effective and safe technique for controlling intractable upper abdominal cancer pain. This treatment increases blood concentrationlevels of motilin and β-endorphin and improves the quality of life of patients with cancer pain.Keywords Cancer pain; Neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB); Motilin; Endorphins; Quality of life

     

/

返回文章
返回